Know who is behind the account
Type a business name and address and get a sourced brief. It needs no case and no statements — a name is enough, which means you can run it before a file exists.
What makes it trustworthy
Writing claims about a real, named company into an underwriting file is a serious act. These are the rules it works under.
A URL is required by the output format, not optional — an optional citation is the one that gets skipped when a model wants to sound complete. Anything it cannot source is listed as unconfirmed instead of written as fact.
Business names repeat across states and industries. The brief says whether it confirmed the company against the address, and a confident write-up of the wrong firm is the failure it is designed to prevent.
Some records are behind forms a search cannot drive. The brief names them, so an unsearched database never reads as a clean one.
A filed complaint is reported as a filed complaint, attributed to the source that published it — not restated as a finding about the business.
What it looks at
In the order that decides files. Court dockets are deliberately excluded — DataMerch and the court search already cover that ground.
Run it on a file you already decided.
The fastest way to judge underwriting software is to point it at a deal you have already worked and see whether it reaches the same place — and whether it admits what it doesn't know.